Clyne v State of New South Wales [2012] NSWCA 265
There was no error in the primary judge's handling of apprehended bias, rejection of evidence, or findings regarding the sufficiency of the evidence for wrongful arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution claims; the applicant's case lacked evidential support and the legal requirements were not met.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['wrongful Arrest' 'false Imprisonment' 'malicious Prosecution' 'apprehended Bias']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the primary judge erred in refusing to disqualify herself for apprehended bias' "Whether the judge erred in rejecting evidence related to informers' criminal backgrounds and Local Court transcript" 'Whether evidence was sufficient to support claims of wrongful arrest and false imprisonment' 'Whether evidence was sufficient to support claim of malicious prosecution']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error in the primary judge's handling of apprehended bias, rejection of evidence, or findings regarding the sufficiency of the evidence for wrongful arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution claims; the applicant's case lacked evidential support and the legal requirements were not met.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment