Chippendale on behalf of the Wuthathi People #2 v State of Queensland [2012] FCA 310
The Court was satisfied that each of Meun Lifu, George Pausa and Isaac Savage had demonstrated asserted native title interests that may be affected by a determination in favour of the Wuthathi applicants and that delay should not defeat their joinder. However, they were joined only in their individual capacities...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title Determination Proceeding; Application for Joinder Under S 84(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth) / Reasons for Judgment and Orders on Amended Notice of Motion for Joinder
- Outcome
- Application for joinder granted in part; the three individual applicants were joined as respondent parties, but not in a representative capacity on behalf of the Gudang Yadhaykenu people.
- Legal Topics
- ['joinder of Parties' 'representative Capacity' 'native Title Determination Applications' 'affected Interests' 'federal Court Rules and Native Title Act Procedure']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Native Title Determination Proceeding; Application for Joinder Under S 84(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth) / Reasons for Judgment and Orders on Amended Notice of Motion for Joinder
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Meun Lifu, George Pausa and Isaac Savage had interests that may be affected by a determination in the Wuthathi native title proceedings for the purposes of s 84(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).' 'Whether it was in the interests of justice to join the joinder applicants as respondent parties despite delay and the advanced state of the principal proceedings.' 'Whether the joinder applicants should be joined in a representative capacity on behalf of the Gudang Yadhaykenu people.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that each of Meun Lifu, George Pausa and Isaac Savage had demonstrated asserted native title interests that may be affected by a determination in favour of the Wuthathi applicants and that delay should not defeat their joinder. However, they were joined only in their individual capacities because the material did not demonstrate that the Gudang Yadhaykenu people had, by traditional laws and customs or another adopted decision-making process, accepted or authorised the applicants to represent their common interests.
Court Disposition
Application for joinder granted in part; the three individual applicants were joined as respondent parties, but not in a representative capacity on behalf of the Gudang Yadhaykenu people.
Orders
- ['Meun Lifu, George Pausa and Isaac Savage be joined as respondent parties to the principal proceedings.' 'The parties are directed to confer with a view to submitting to the Court within one month proposed directions for the future conduct of the matter.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment