State of Victoria v Macedonian Teachers Association of Victoria [1999] FCA 1287

State of Victoria v Macedonian Teachers Association of Victoria [1999] FCA 1287

The appeal was dismissed because the primary judge correctly held that "based on" in s 9(1) of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) means "by reference to" rather than requiring a causal nexus equivalent to "by reason of". The Court also held that, on the remitted determination, the Briginshaw principle was not attracted merely by the possibility of finding a government had contravened an anti-discrimination statute where deliberate discrimination, fraud, impropriety, or probity was not in issue.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 September 1999
Procedural Posture
Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia Concerning Judicial Review Under S 5 of the Administrative Decisions (judicial Review) Act 1977 (cth) of a Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Decision / Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['direct Racial Discrimination' 'racial Discrimination Act 1975 (cth) S 9(1)' 'statutory Interpretation of "based On"' 'judicial Review of Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Decision' 'standard of Proof' 'briginshaw Principle']
['discrimination Law' 'administrative Law'] ['direct Racial Discrimination' 'racial Discrimination Act 1975 (cth) S 9(1)' 'statutory Interpretation of "based On"' 'judicial Review of Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Decision' 'standard of Proof' 'briginshaw Principle']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia Concerning Judicial Review Under S 5 of the Administrative Decisions (judicial Review) Act 1977 (cth) of a Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Decision / Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the phrase "based on" in s 9(1) of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) means "by reference to" rather than requiring a causal nexus equivalent to "by reason of" or "on the ground of".' "Whether the Commission erred in construing s 9(1) when dismissing the discrimination complaint about the Premier of Victoria's directive on descriptions of Macedonian people and language." 'Whether the Briginshaw principle applied to determination of the existence of unlawful discrimination under s 9(1) in this case.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the primary judge correctly held that "based on" in s 9(1) of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) means "by reference to" rather than requiring a causal nexus equivalent to "by reason of". The Court also held that, on the remitted determination, the Briginshaw principle was not attracted merely by the possibility of finding a government had contravened an anti-discrimination statute where deliberate discrimination, fraud, impropriety, or probity was not in issue.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed with costs.']