State of Western Australia v Fazeldean on behalf of the Thalanyji People (No 2) [2013] FCAFC 58

State of Western Australia v Fazeldean on behalf of the Thalanyji People (No 2) [2013] FCAFC 58

Leave to appeal was refused because, even if the State's criticism of the primary judge's emphasis on mutual intention were accepted, it was inappropriate to dispose of the Thalanyji No 2 claim summarily. The construction and effect of the Hayes consent dismissal, the forensic context of the 2008 settlement, the special communal and intergenerational character of rights under the Native Title Act, and possible questions about the operation or qualification of res judicata in that context required final rather than summary determination, with any res judicata issue to be pleaded.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal in Native Title Proceedings / Leave to Appeal From Rejection of Summary Dismissal Application Dismissed
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed; costs of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal to be costs in the proceedings below.
Legal Topics
['abuse of Process' 'res Judicata' 'consent Orders' 'summary Dismissal' 'native Title Determination Applications']
['native Title' 'civil Procedure'] ['abuse of Process' 'res Judicata' 'consent Orders' 'summary Dismissal' 'native Title Determination Applications']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal in Native Title Proceedings / Leave to Appeal From Rejection of Summary Dismissal Application Dismissed

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Thalanyji No 2 native title determination application should be summarily dismissed as an abuse of process because it claimed native title over land covered by an earlier consent dismissal in Hayes on behalf of the Thalanyji People v State of Western Australia [2008] FCA 1487.' 'Whether principles of res judicata arising from a consent order precluded the same claim group from bringing a later native title claim over the excluded area.' "Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the primary judge's refusal to dismiss the proceeding."]

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because, even if the State's criticism of the primary judge's emphasis on mutual intention were accepted, it was inappropriate to dispose of the Thalanyji No 2 claim summarily. The construction and effect of the Hayes consent dismissal, the forensic context of the 2008 settlement, the special communal and intergenerational character of rights under the Native Title Act, and possible questions about the operation or qualification of res judicata in that context required final rather than summary determination, with any res judicata issue to be pleaded.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed; costs of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal to be costs in the proceedings below.

Orders

  • ['(Made on 13 May 2013) Application for leave to appeal be dismissed.' 'Costs of the State and the claim group in the application be costs in the underlying proceedings.']