Drury v State of Western Australia [2000] FCA 132
There is no requirement under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) for applicants to swear fresh verifying affidavits every time a native title determination application is amended unless the amendment involves the replacement of applicants; the Court may direct supporting affidavits at its discretion.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title Determination Application / Motion to Amend Application
- Outcome
- Amendment allowed; no requirement for fresh applicant affidavits; ancillary orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Applications' 'verifying Affidavits' 'claimant Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Native Title Determination Application / Motion to Amend Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether, upon amendment of a native title determination application, fresh verifying affidavits must be sworn by all the applicants under s 62 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).']
Ratio Decidendi
There is no requirement under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) for applicants to swear fresh verifying affidavits every time a native title determination application is amended unless the amendment involves the replacement of applicants; the Court may direct supporting affidavits at its discretion.
Court Disposition
Amendment allowed; no requirement for fresh applicant affidavits; ancillary orders made.
Orders
- ['The application be re-amended in the form of the minute of proposed amended native title determination claimant application filed on 7 February 2000 and that document will stand as the reamended application.' 'Service of the motion and supporting documents on any person other than the State of Western Australia be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment