Stateland Central Pty Limited v Parramatta City Council [2008] NSWLEC 1350
The Court found that the modifications increasing bulk and scale (middle and shoulder units) were inappropriate given the site's context, relationship with adjacent properties, and urban design constraints. Only the four units at the top of the building, which reduce height and do not adversely add to bulk, were permitted. The approved modification reflects the deletion of middle and shoulder units, and maintains appropriate tower readability and streetscape relationship.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under S 96(6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment on Modification Application
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld in part; modification application approved in part
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application Modification' 'bulk and Scale' 'impact on Heritage' 'floor Space Ratio' 'height' 'streetscape' 'urban Design']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under S 96(6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment on Modification Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed s 96 modification increasing floor levels and FSR should be approved, considering bulk, scale, urban design, and heritage impacts']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the modifications increasing bulk and scale (middle and shoulder units) were inappropriate given the site's context, relationship with adjacent properties, and urban design constraints. Only the four units at the top of the building, which reduce height and do not adversely add to bulk, were permitted. The approved modification reflects the deletion of middle and shoulder units, and maintains appropriate tower readability and streetscape relationship.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld in part; modification application approved in part
Orders
- ['Appeal in respect of 8 Cowper Street Parramatta is upheld in part.' 's 96 modification application as amended is approved.' 'Exhibits are returned to parties except for amended plans and conditions.' 'Approval reflects four units only at upper levels, with deletion of middle and shoulder units.' 's 94 contribution...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment