Sebie v Pham [2019] NSWCA 58
Applicants failed to demonstrate a proper basis for a stay; the respondents' undertaking to preserve the property and substantial assets lessen any prejudice. The primary judge's orders for payment out should stand pending appeal, and applicants are protected by ongoing undertakings, rights against remaining funds, and personal restitution rights.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Stay Pending Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- stay refused; paragraph 10 of application dismissed; costs ordered against applicants
- Legal Topics
- ['stay of Execution' 'costs' 'appellate Practice' 'property' 'undertakings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Stay Pending Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether orders for payment out of moneys in court should be stayed pending determination of related proceedings and appeal' 'Whether applicants have demonstrated a proper basis for a stay' "Effect of undertakings proffered by respondents to protect applicants' interests"]
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants failed to demonstrate a proper basis for a stay; the respondents' undertaking to preserve the property and substantial assets lessen any prejudice. The primary judge's orders for payment out should stand pending appeal, and applicants are protected by ongoing undertakings, rights against remaining funds, and personal restitution rights.
Court Disposition
stay refused; paragraph 10 of application dismissed; costs ordered against applicants
Orders
- ['I note the undertaking of counsel appearing for Mr and Mrs Pham on behalf of his clients not to further encumber or transfer the property until the earlier of four months from today or determination of the appeal, and not to transfer the property for six months without written notice to applicants.' 'Dismiss...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment