BREEN v PLUMB [1991] NSWCA 31
On the balance of convenience, greater inconvenience would be caused by dislocating the claimants and their child pending the appeal, and a stay of execution should be granted, conditional on claimants' payment of back rent into a jointly administered account.
- Parties
- Claimant: Diana Breen; Claimant: Philip Leslie Fuller; Opponent: Ronald John Plumb
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Stay Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Stay of execution of possession order granted pending appeal, subject to payment terms.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Possession Orders, Domestic Disputes, Balance of Convenience
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Diana Breen
Claimant
Philip Leslie Fuller
Claimant
Ronald John Plumb
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Stay Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant a stay of execution of the order for possession pending appeal
- 2 Terms for stay including payment of back rent
- 3 Balance of convenience between parties
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of convenience, greater inconvenience would be caused by dislocating the claimants and their child pending the appeal, and a stay of execution should be granted, conditional on claimants' payment of back rent into a jointly administered account.
Court Disposition
Stay of execution of possession order granted pending appeal, subject to payment terms.
Orders
- Stay execution of the judgment entered by Young J on 7 March 1991 until determination of the appeal or further order.
- Expedite hearing of the appeal, category B, to be heard within approximately two months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment