WOMEN'S HOSPITAL CROWN STREET v KOTADIS [1988] NSWCA 178
Original jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal should be invoked for stay of execution without precondition where claimant faces risk of irreparable loss if large payment is made in advance and opponent's assets are modest.
- Parties
- Claimant: Women's Hospital Crown Street; Opponent: Kotadis
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay / Court of Appeal—motion Ancillary to Appeal
- Outcome
- stay granted; costs ordered
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeals, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Women's Hospital Crown Street
Claimant
Kotadis
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay / Court of Appeal—motion Ancillary to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 proper procedure for seeking a stay pending appeal
- 2 appropriateness of conditions imposed upon stay
- 3 repayment risk if advance payment is ordered
Ratio Decidendi
Original jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal should be invoked for stay of execution without precondition where claimant faces risk of irreparable loss if large payment is made in advance and opponent's assets are modest.
Court Disposition
stay granted; costs ordered
Orders
- Execution upon the judgment entered following the verdict of the jury is stayed until the hearing of the appeal or any further or other order of the Court.
- Claimant to pay the costs of the opponent of and incidental to the proceedings before the Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment