BUD-PAK PTY LTD v ADAMSTOWN ENGINEERING PTY LTD [1995] NSWCA 64
Given the difficulties of disturbing primary judge's credibility findings and the lateness of the appellant's notice of appeal, there is insufficient warrant to stay execution of the costs order; the costs assessment should proceed.
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Bud-Pak Pty Ltd; Respondent/defendant: Adamstown Engineering Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Execution of Costs Order on Appeal / Interlocutory Motion Before Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Motion for stay of execution of the order for costs dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Costs, Appeals, Credibility Findings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bud-Pak Pty Ltd
Appellant/plaintiff
Adamstown Engineering Pty Ltd
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Execution of Costs Order on Appeal / Interlocutory Motion Before Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the execution of the costs order should be stayed pending appeal
- 2 The weight to be given to credibility findings in appeals against the primary judge's findings
Ratio Decidendi
Given the difficulties of disturbing primary judge's credibility findings and the lateness of the appellant's notice of appeal, there is insufficient warrant to stay execution of the costs order; the costs assessment should proceed.
Court Disposition
Motion for stay of execution of the order for costs dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Motion for stay of execution of the order for costs, dismissed with costs.
- Orders 1 and 2 in the further amended notice of motion made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment