STRONG v THE LAW SOCIETY OF NSW & ANOR [2001] NSWCA 311

STRONG v THE LAW SOCIETY OF NSW & ANOR [2001] NSWCA 311

The Court was not satisfied that the proceedings in the Tribunal would constitute an abuse of process, as the Tribunal is equipped to address prejudice from witness unavailability and to determine admissibility of evidence, and there is other material available in support of the allegations. The extraordinary jurisdiction to stay or prohibit the proceedings should not be exercised at this stage.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 September 2001
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay/prohibition / Appeal From Interlocutory Applications Prior to Hearing in Tribunal
Outcome
Summons dismissed with costs (including reserved costs)
Legal Topics
['stay of Proceedings' 'abuse of Process' 'delay in Proceedings' 'professional Misconduct' 'prejudice From Death of Witness']
['legal Profession' 'administrative Law'] ['stay of Proceedings' 'abuse of Process' 'delay in Proceedings' 'professional Misconduct' 'prejudice From Death of Witness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Stay/prohibition / Appeal From Interlocutory Applications Prior to Hearing in Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal proceedings should be stayed or prohibited as an abuse of process due to delay and the death of a key witness' 'Whether sufficient prejudice exists to justify the intervention by the Court of Appeal']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court was not satisfied that the proceedings in the Tribunal would constitute an abuse of process, as the Tribunal is equipped to address prejudice from witness unavailability and to determine admissibility of evidence, and there is other material available in support of the allegations. The extraordinary jurisdiction to stay or prohibit the proceedings should not be exercised at this stage.

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed with costs (including reserved costs)

Orders

  • ['Summons dismissed with costs, including reserved costs of the previous stay application.']