STDB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 862
Because the claims, Tribunal member, Tribunal reasons and alleged jurisdictional errors were substantially the same as in STJB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 861, and the parties agreed the same reasoning and result should apply, the Court applied the reasons in STJB and dismissed the application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Writs of Prohibition, Certiorari, Mandamus And/or Injunctions in Relation to a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Federal Court Application for Judicial Review Dismissed
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'blood Feud']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Writs of Prohibition, Certiorari, Mandamus And/or Injunctions in Relation to a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Federal Court Application for Judicial Review Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal decision affirming refusal of a protection visa was invalid by reason of jurisdictional error.' 'Whether the same reasoning and result should apply as in STJB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 861.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the claims, Tribunal member, Tribunal reasons and alleged jurisdictional errors were substantially the same as in STJB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 861, and the parties agreed the same reasoning and result should apply, the Court applied the reasons in STJB and dismissed the application.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment