Steele v Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Board [No 2] [1956] HCA 4

Steele v Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Board [No 2] [1956] HCA 4

The reclassification of the appellant as Class C (less than 30% incapacity) was justified because, although the physical disability did not change, the appellant's employment history demonstrated that avenues of civil employment were open to him to an extent that his incapacity for civil employment was less than thirty per cent.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Single Judge Determination Following Case Stated to Full Court
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['reclassification of Retirement Benefits' 'incapacity Assessment in Relation to Civil Employment']
['administrative Law' 'military Law' 'pensions Law'] ['reclassification of Retirement Benefits' 'incapacity Assessment in Relation to Civil Employment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Single Judge Determination Following Case Stated to Full Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Board could lawfully reclassify the appellant under s. 53(1) of the Defence Forces Retirement Benefits Act 1948-1952 in the absence of change in his physical disability' "Whether the nature of the appellant's post-retirement employment could warrant a variation of the percentage of incapacity for civil employment"]

Ratio Decidendi

The reclassification of the appellant as Class C (less than 30% incapacity) was justified because, although the physical disability did not change, the appellant's employment history demonstrated that avenues of civil employment were open to him to an extent that his incapacity for civil employment was less than thirty per cent.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings but not including the costs of and incidental to the case stated for the opinion of the Full Court."]