Christofidellis, Stelios & Anor v Zdrilic, Ned & Visinga & Ors [1997] FCA 668
Security for costs should not be ordered against impecunious natural persons absent special circumstances; no evidence placed by applicants justifying departure from established practice; proximity of trial and nature of applicants as individuals weigh against granting security for costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Security for Costs / Post Motion Hearing, Reasons for Decision
- Outcome
- Application for security for costs dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'impecuniosity' 'discretion of Court']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Security for Costs / Post Motion Hearing, Reasons for Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Should the applicants, natural persons, be ordered to provide security for costs?' 'Does limited financial means or potential asset rearrangement justify ordering security for costs?']
Ratio Decidendi
Security for costs should not be ordered against impecunious natural persons absent special circumstances; no evidence placed by applicants justifying departure from established practice; proximity of trial and nature of applicants as individuals weigh against granting security for costs.
Court Disposition
Application for security for costs dismissed.
Orders
- ["Fourth respondents' application for applicants to provide security for costs dismissed." "Fourth respondents to pay applicants' costs of notice of motion of 19 June 1997 (50% of costs of hearing on 27 June 1997 allocated)." "Second and third respondents' application for security for costs dismissed." "Second and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment