AXIAK v PEZZANO [NO 2] [2002] NSWCA 107
The difference between the defendant's settlement offer and the sum found by the Court demonstrates the offer was unreasonably low; accordingly, the plaintiff was entitled to interest on past loss of income under Motor Accidents Act 1988 s 73(4)(a)(iv).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment on Costs and Interest
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Judgment for appellant with interest and costs orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['interest on Past Loss of Income' 'costs Orders' 'damages for Economic Loss' 'apportionment for Infants']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment on Costs and Interest
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether plaintiff is entitled to interest on past loss of income after deduction for dependency under s 73(4)(a)(iv) Motor Accidents Act 1988' "Reasonableness of the defendant's settlement offer"]
Ratio Decidendi
The difference between the defendant's settlement offer and the sum found by the Court demonstrates the offer was unreasonably low; accordingly, the plaintiff was entitled to interest on past loss of income under Motor Accidents Act 1988 s 73(4)(a)(iv).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Judgment for appellant with interest and costs orders.
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed' 'Verdict and judgment of the Court below set aside' 'Verdict and judgment for the appellant in the sum of $1,439,586.25' '$368,125.00 apportioned to Jordan Dimitri Ternovy, infant, son of plaintiff and late Ivan James Ternovy' 'Respondent to pay into Court $368,125.00 to be paid to Public Trustee...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment