Haynes v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 844

Haynes v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 844

The applicant failed to establish a strong prima facie case of jurisdictional error or denial of procedural fairness, and the balance of convenience did not favour granting interlocutory release from detention; accordingly, interlocutory relief was refused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 July 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Interlocutory Application for Mandatory Injunction
Outcome
Interlocutory relief refused
Legal Topics
['jurisdictional Error' 'natural Justice' 'procedural Fairness' 'ministerial Discretion' 'interlocutory Relief']
['administrative Law' 'migration Law'] ['jurisdictional Error' 'natural Justice' 'procedural Fairness' 'ministerial Discretion' 'interlocutory Relief']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Interlocutory Application for Mandatory Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the respondent failed to have regard to relevant considerations in visa cancellation' 'Whether the applicant was denied procedural fairness or natural justice' 'Whether interlocutory release from immigration detention should be granted']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to establish a strong prima facie case of jurisdictional error or denial of procedural fairness, and the balance of convenience did not favour granting interlocutory release from detention; accordingly, interlocutory relief was refused.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory relief refused

Orders

  • ['The application for interlocutory relief is refused.' 'Costs are reserved.']