Stokes v Waverley Council [2019] NSWLEC 1137
The Court found the development application relied on works (piles) located on adjoining land without owner's consent, which is a fundamental jurisdictional hurdle not overcome. Consequently, the Court has no power to grant consent under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 and Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; development application refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Applications' 'owners Consent' 'excavation' 'dual Occupancy' 'fsr Breach' 'height Standards' 'structural Integrity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the jurisdictional requirements for owner's consent regarding reliance on works on adjoining land were satisfied" 'Whether the development application complies with statutory requirements for floor space ratio (FSR), height, and excavation' "Whether the development application is lawful without owner's consent from adjoining property"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the development application relied on works (piles) located on adjoining land without owner's consent, which is a fundamental jurisdictional hurdle not overcome. Consequently, the Court has no power to grant consent under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 and Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; development application refused.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'Development Application 404/2017 seeking alterations and additions to an approved five storey building for use as a dual occupancy, with additional excavation, on Lot 43 DP 10771, also known as 21 Thompson Street, Tamarama is refused.' 'The exhibits, except for Exhibits 1, 2 and K are...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment