Badger v John Kagelaris Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1792
Both Mr Sengos and Mr Kagelaris were primarily liable for making misleading representations as to sales figures and customer base, which caused Mr Badger to enter the Business Sale Agreement and suffer loss. The agreement was made void, and Mr Badger entitled to compensation and costs.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Stephen Badger; First Defendant: John Kagelaris Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: John Kagelaris; Third Defendant: Paul Sengos
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Final Orders After Hearing
- Outcome
- Business Sale Agreement declared void; compensation and costs awarded to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Pre Contractual Representations, Rescission, Accessorial Liability, Affirmation of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Badger
Plaintiff
John Kagelaris Pty Ltd
First Defendant
John Kagelaris
Second Defendant
Paul Sengos
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Final Orders After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the defendants engage in misleading or deceptive conduct under s 18(1) of the Australian Consumer Law?
- 2 Were the representations relied upon and did they cause loss?
- 3 Is the plaintiff entitled to rescission and compensation?
Ratio Decidendi
Both Mr Sengos and Mr Kagelaris were primarily liable for making misleading representations as to sales figures and customer base, which caused Mr Badger to enter the Business Sale Agreement and suffer loss. The agreement was made void, and Mr Badger entitled to compensation and costs.
Court Disposition
Business Sale Agreement declared void; compensation and costs awarded to plaintiff.
Orders
- Declare the whole of the Business Sale Agreement between the plaintiff and the first and second defendants dated 14 January 2017 to be void pursuant to Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2, s 243.
- Order the second and third defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $114,991.48 pursuant to Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2, s 237.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment