R v BEARD [1999] NSWCCA 392
Given the applicant's serious breach of trust as an employee selling private client information for personal gain, and upon review of all subjective and objective circumstances (including co-offender comparisons and the applicant's poor health), the sentence imposed was within the scope of the sentencing judge's discretion and not manifestly excessive.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Stephen Beard
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Trust, Corruption by Agent, Sentencing Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Stephen Beard
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in principle by comparison with sentences imposed on co-offenders
Ratio Decidendi
Given the applicant's serious breach of trust as an employee selling private client information for personal gain, and upon review of all subjective and objective circumstances (including co-offender comparisons and the applicant's poor health), the sentence imposed was within the scope of the sentencing judge's discretion and not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused
- Applicant may be taken into custody
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment