Cable v Gray [2022] NSWSC 1551
The Review Panel’s refusal to defer assessment and failure to provide reasons denied the plaintiff procedural fairness, amounting to jurisdictional error and requiring the setting aside of the certificate and referral of the matter to a different review panel.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Stephen Cable; First Defendant: Amanda Gray; Third Defendant: A Review Panel constituted under s 63 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999; Fourth Defendant: President of the Personal Injury Commission of NSW
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Certificate set aside, matter referred to a different review panel.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdictional Error, Procedural Fairness, Judicial Review, Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (nsw), Medical Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Cable
Plaintiff
Amanda Gray
First Defendant
A Review Panel constituted under s 63 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999
Third Defendant
President of the Personal Injury Commission of NSW
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Review Panel failed to accord procedural fairness by refusing to defer the assessment
- 2 Whether the failure to provide reasons for refusing the adjournment constituted jurisdictional error
Ratio Decidendi
The Review Panel’s refusal to defer assessment and failure to provide reasons denied the plaintiff procedural fairness, amounting to jurisdictional error and requiring the setting aside of the certificate and referral of the matter to a different review panel.
Court Disposition
Certificate set aside, matter referred to a different review panel.
Orders
- The certificate of the third defendant dated 5 December 2021 is set aside.
- The fourth defendant is to refer the matter for further assessment by a different review panel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment