Carr v R [2020] NSWCCA 214

Carr v R [2020] NSWCCA 214

The appeal was dismissed because the applicant’s grounds merely asserted that the sentencing judge gave insufficient weight to certain factors; however, all such factors were appropriately considered in the exercise of the sentencing discretion, and no error was demonstrated warranting appellate intervention.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 August 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal against sentence dismissed.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'child Sexual Offences' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'weight Given to Mitigating/aggravating Factors']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge gave insufficient weight to the applicant's remorse" "Whether insufficient weight was given to the applicant's health and background, including own experience of sexual abuse" 'Whether sufficient regard was paid to the period during which the applicant had not offended since the charged conduct' 'Whether the appeal court should intervene on the basis of the exercise of sentencing discretion']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the applicant’s grounds merely asserted that the sentencing judge gave insufficient weight to certain factors; however, all such factors were appropriately considered in the exercise of the sentencing discretion, and no error was demonstrated warranting appellate intervention.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal against sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed.']