Regina v Radford [2002] NSWCCA 122
The combination of the applicant's operation of an ongoing drug supply business, bad criminal record, fact that he was on recognisance at the time, lack of guilty plea, and absence of compelling subjective factors meant the sentence was not outside the permissible range. Neither the sentence nor the non-parole period exceeded the permissible range, and no error was established warranting variation of the sentence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'drug Offences' 'ongoing Supply of Prohibited Drugs' 'mental Health and Sentencing' 'mitigating Factors']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence for supplying heroin on an ongoing basis was manifestly excessive' 'Whether mental illness and protective custody warranted moderation of the sentence' 'Whether special circumstances were established regarding parole']
Ratio Decidendi
The combination of the applicant's operation of an ongoing drug supply business, bad criminal record, fact that he was on recognisance at the time, lack of guilty plea, and absence of compelling subjective factors meant the sentence was not outside the permissible range. Neither the sentence nor the non-parole period exceeded the permissible range, and no error was established warranting variation of the sentence.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment