Cleary v North Sydney Council [2009] NSWLEC 1437
The proposal fails to satisfy building height, form, and streetscape compatibility controls, resulting in excessive scale and visual impact contrary to neighbourhood consistency and relevant planning controls.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'streetscape Impact' 'building Height' 'bulk and Scale' 'setbacks']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed first floor addition constitutes overdevelopment due to height, bulk and scale' 'Whether the proposal is compatible with the immediate neighbourhood and streetscape' 'Compliance with relevant planning controls including LEP and DCP provisions']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal fails to satisfy building height, form, and streetscape compatibility controls, resulting in excessive scale and visual impact contrary to neighbourhood consistency and relevant planning controls.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'Development consent to DA 128/09 for alterations and additions at the front of the semi-detached dwelling at 1 Rodborough Avenue, Crows Nest is refused.' 'Exhibits may be returned except for A, B and 2.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment