Collinson v Paxus Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1032
Application for leave to amend pleading to re-join Transport for NSW and Career Corporation Pty Ltd as defendants is refused as constituting abuse of process: plaintiff is bound by undertakings not to sue those parties again, which were given by solicitor as part of the earlier discontinuance, and to allow the amendment would breach the principle of finality, justifying refusal even without resolving limitation arguments.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion in Ongoing Proceedings / Interlocutory—application for Leave to Amend Pleading
- Outcome
- Leave to amend paragraphs 3 and 4 of draft further amended statement of claim granted; otherwise, notice of motion dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Amend Pleading' 'joinder of Parties' 'res Judicata and Abuse of Process' 'effect of Discontinuance' 'limitation Period—personal Injury' 'professional Negligence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion in Ongoing Proceedings / Interlocutory—application for Leave to Amend Pleading
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether plaintiff should be granted leave to amend pleading to join Transport for NSW and Career Corporation Pty Ltd as defendants after previous discontinuance and undertakings not to sue' 'Whether amendment is statute-barred under the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW)' 'Whether application for amendment constitutes an abuse of process due to undertakings and finality of litigation' 'Authority of solicitor to bind client to undertakings in the course of litigation']
Ratio Decidendi
Application for leave to amend pleading to re-join Transport for NSW and Career Corporation Pty Ltd as defendants is refused as constituting abuse of process: plaintiff is bound by undertakings not to sue those parties again, which were given by solicitor as part of the earlier discontinuance, and to allow the amendment would breach the principle of finality, justifying refusal even without resolving limitation arguments.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend paragraphs 3 and 4 of draft further amended statement of claim granted; otherwise, notice of motion dismissed.
Orders
- ['Grant leave to the plaintiff to amend paragraphs 3 and 4 of its draft further amended statement of claim.' "Otherwise, dismiss the plaintiff's notice of motion filed on 10 June 2021." "Unless any party makes a written application within 7 days for a different order: (a) order the plaintiff to pay Transport for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment