Donohue v Australian Fisheries Management Authority [2000] FCA 901

Donohue v Australian Fisheries Management Authority [2000] FCA 901

The s 43 order was valid because it was legislative in character, there was material on which the delegate could be satisfied that urgent action was necessary for management of the Southern Bluefin Tuna fishery, the action was consistent with AFMA's objectives, other options had been considered and rejected as...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Application for Review, Prohibition, Injunction and Declaration Challenging Validity of a Temporary Order Under S 43 of the Fisheries Management Act 1991 (cth) / Final Hearing
Outcome
Application dismissed.
Legal Topics
['validity of Temporary Fisheries Management Order' 'legislative Character of Administrative Instrument' "delegate's State of Satisfaction" 'statutory Fishing Rights' 'vessel Monitoring System Requirements']
['administrative Law' 'fisheries Management'] ['validity of Temporary Fisheries Management Order' 'legislative Character of Administrative Instrument' "delegate's State of Satisfaction" 'statutory Fishing Rights' 'vessel Monitoring System Requirements']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Review, Prohibition, Injunction and Declaration Challenging Validity of a Temporary Order Under S 43 of the Fisheries Management Act 1991 (cth) / Final Hearing

  1. 1 ['Whether the order made under s 43 of the Fisheries Management Act 1991 (Cth) was legislative rather than administrative in character.' "Whether AFMA's delegate was satisfied of the statutory preconditions in s 43(2)." 'Whether circumstances existed requiring urgent action for purposes related to management of the Southern Bluefin Tuna fishery.' 'Whether the delegate, Mr Meere, formed an independent state of satisfaction.']

Ratio Decidendi

The s 43 order was valid because it was legislative in character, there was material on which the delegate could be satisfied that urgent action was necessary for management of the Southern Bluefin Tuna fishery, the action was consistent with AFMA's objectives, other options had been considered and rejected as inappropriate, and the delegate did form the requisite state of satisfaction.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The application is dismissed.' "The applicants pay the respondents' costs including reserved costs, except for the costs of the hearing on 19 June 2000."]