Donohue v Australian Fisheries Management Authority [2000] FCA 901
The s 43 order was valid because it was legislative in character, there was material on which the delegate could be satisfied that urgent action was necessary for management of the Southern Bluefin Tuna fishery, the action was consistent with AFMA's objectives, other options had been considered and rejected as...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review, Prohibition, Injunction and Declaration Challenging Validity of a Temporary Order Under S 43 of the Fisheries Management Act 1991 (cth) / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['validity of Temporary Fisheries Management Order' 'legislative Character of Administrative Instrument' "delegate's State of Satisfaction" 'statutory Fishing Rights' 'vessel Monitoring System Requirements']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review, Prohibition, Injunction and Declaration Challenging Validity of a Temporary Order Under S 43 of the Fisheries Management Act 1991 (cth) / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the order made under s 43 of the Fisheries Management Act 1991 (Cth) was legislative rather than administrative in character.' "Whether AFMA's delegate was satisfied of the statutory preconditions in s 43(2)." 'Whether circumstances existed requiring urgent action for purposes related to management of the Southern Bluefin Tuna fishery.' 'Whether the delegate, Mr Meere, formed an independent state of satisfaction.']
Ratio Decidendi
The s 43 order was valid because it was legislative in character, there was material on which the delegate could be satisfied that urgent action was necessary for management of the Southern Bluefin Tuna fishery, the action was consistent with AFMA's objectives, other options had been considered and rejected as inappropriate, and the delegate did form the requisite state of satisfaction.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.' "The applicants pay the respondents' costs including reserved costs, except for the costs of the hearing on 19 June 2000."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment