Wallace v Queanbeyan City Council [2009] NSWLEC 1045
The Court modified the council's s 121B order because the shed's visual impact was low and could be softened by required landscaping, and garaging the trucks and equipment was compatible with the applicable rural residential controls; however, the public interest in maintaining Development Control Plan controls justified requiring a partial reduction so the shed would achieve sufficient compliance at approximately 330 square metres.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against an Order Issued Under S 121 B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Ex Tempore Judgment Following an Unsuccessful S 34 Conciliation Conference Under the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- The s 121B order was modified to require partial removal and re-cladding of the shed; exhibits were returned except exhibits 5 and A.
- Legal Topics
- ['section 121 B Order' 'rural Residential Development' 'development Consent Conditions' 'shed Size and Visual Impact' 'development Control Plan Compliance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against an Order Issued Under S 121 B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Ex Tempore Judgment Following an Unsuccessful S 34 Conciliation Conference Under the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the s 121B order requiring compliance with conditions 5 and 6 of development consent 500/2005 should be upheld or modified.' "Whether the existing rural shed's size and bulk were acceptable having regard to the Yarralumla Local Environmental Plan 2002 and Development Control Plan controls." 'Whether garaging two trucks with trailers, plant, equipment and domestic vehicles on the site was compatible with rural residential amenity.' 'Whether visual landscape impacts could be adequately addressed by landscaping and partial reduction of the shed.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court modified the council's s 121B order because the shed's visual impact was low and could be softened by required landscaping, and garaging the trucks and equipment was compatible with the applicable rural residential controls; however, the public interest in maintaining Development Control Plan controls justified requiring a partial reduction so the shed would achieve sufficient compliance at approximately 330 square metres.
Court Disposition
The s 121B order was modified to require partial removal and re-cladding of the shed; exhibits were returned except exhibits 5 and A.
Orders
- ['The order issued under s 121B, order No 15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 dated 21 April 2008 is modified by deleting the words under the headings Terms of Order, Period for Compliance with Order and Reason for Order and inserting replacement terms.' 'A 6.5 metre length of the southern bay...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment