McDade v United Kingdom [1999] FCA 1579
The applicant did not establish the jurisdictional pre-condition of "special circumstances" for bail. The earlier high risk pregnancy circumstance no longer existed, the evidence of the wife's current post-natal depression did not have the same high compellability, potential family hardship was an ordinary consequence of incarceration, available family assistance was not adequately explained, and Carr J's dismissal of the review application increased the possibility of absconding.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition Application for Bail Under S 21(6)(f)(iv) of the Extradition Act (1988) (cth) / Notice of Motion for Bail After Dismissal of Application for Review by Carr J and Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for bail refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['special Circumstances' 'risk of Absconding' 'post Natal Depression and Family Hardship']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Extradition Application for Bail Under S 21(6)(f)(iv) of the Extradition Act (1988) (cth) / Notice of Motion for Bail After Dismissal of Application for Review by Carr J and Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant established "special circumstances" under s 21(6)(f)(iv) of the Extradition Act (1988) (Cth) to justify release on bail.' "Whether the medical and family circumstances following the birth of the applicant's child were sufficient to satisfy the high onus for bail." 'Whether the dismissal of the application for review increased the risk that the applicant might abscond.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not establish the jurisdictional pre-condition of "special circumstances" for bail. The earlier high risk pregnancy circumstance no longer existed, the evidence of the wife's current post-natal depression did not have the same high compellability, potential family hardship was an ordinary consequence of incarceration, available family assistance was not adequately explained, and Carr J's dismissal of the review application increased the possibility of absconding.
Court Disposition
Application for bail refused.
Orders
- ["The applicant's notice of motion dated 1 October 1999 be refused." 'The District Registrar be requested to list the appeal from the decision of Carr J as a matter of urgency.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs to be taxed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment