Regina v Stephen John Rae [2001] NSWCCA 545
The sentence imposed by the sentencing Judge was within the range properly available given the objective seriousness and circumstances of the offence, and there was no error regarding the discount for the plea of guilty or assessment of mitigating factors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; substantive appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'severity of Sentence' 'appeal Against Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether sentencing Judge erred in applying a discount for plea of guilty; Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive; Whether subjective factors in favour of the applicant were insufficiently considered']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed by the sentencing Judge was within the range properly available given the objective seriousness and circumstances of the offence, and there was no error regarding the discount for the plea of guilty or assessment of mitigating factors.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; substantive appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted' 'Substantive appeal against sentence dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment