Marshall v Mar [2017] NSWLEC 1197
The large dead Eucalypt was in an advanced state of decline and sections of it would inevitably fail as the wood deteriorated, making it likely to cause injury to a person and satisfying s 10(2)(b); the appropriate way to abate the risk was removal of the tree to a height of 3m or less.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 2 Application Under S 7 Part 2 of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Tree removal ordered
- Legal Topics
- ['potential Injury From Dead Tree' 'tree Removal' 'adjoining Land']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 2 Application Under S 7 Part 2 of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the tree was a tree to which the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 applies, being situated on adjoining land.' 'Whether the tree was likely to cause injury to any person under s 10(2)(b) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006.' 'What orders were necessary to abate the risk posed by the dead tree.']
Ratio Decidendi
The large dead Eucalypt was in an advanced state of decline and sections of it would inevitably fail as the wood deteriorated, making it likely to cause injury to a person and satisfying s 10(2)(b); the appropriate way to abate the risk was removal of the tree to a height of 3m or less.
Court Disposition
Tree removal ordered
Orders
- ['Within 30 days of the date of these orders the respondent is to engage and pay for an arborist with a minimum qualification in Arboriculture of AQF level 3, and with appropriate insurance cover, to remove the tree to a height of 3m or less.' 'The work is to be carried out in accordance with the WorkCover NSW Code...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment