Garcia v Westwood [2007] FCA 1064
It is reasonably arguable that the first respondent, having become functus officio, engaged in conduct amounting to denial of procedural fairness and ostensible bias, raising a sufficiently arguable issue to warrant continuation of the interlocutory injunction.
- Parties
- Applicant: Stephen Maxwell Garcia; First Respondent: Brigadier Ian Denis Westwood; Second Respondent: Chief of Army
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory Hearing
- Outcome
- Interlocutory injunction extended
- Legal Topics
- Procedural Fairness, Apprehended Bias, Interlocutory Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Maxwell Garcia
Applicant
Brigadier Ian Denis Westwood
First Respondent
Chief of Army
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first respondent, after becoming functus officio, failed to afford the applicant procedural fairness by entertaining an approach from Captain Vithanage and responding as he did
- 2 Whether the first respondent's conduct gave rise to ostensible bias
- 3 Whether there existed a serious question to be tried justifying the continuation of an interlocutory injunction
Ratio Decidendi
It is reasonably arguable that the first respondent, having become functus officio, engaged in conduct amounting to denial of procedural fairness and ostensible bias, raising a sufficiently arguable issue to warrant continuation of the interlocutory injunction.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory injunction extended
Orders
- Extend Order 1 made on 11 July 2007 to 5:00 pm 20 July 2007.
- List matter for final hearing at 2:15 pm 20 July 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment