Larkin v NSW DPP [2007] NSWDC 80

Larkin v NSW DPP [2007] NSWDC 80

The appellant knowingly made false statements on oath during examination and could properly be convicted under s330 of the Crimes Act, as the Corporations Act does not exclude concurrent State offences, and there was no basis for staying the prosecution as an abuse of process.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed; conviction confirmed; sentence varied
Legal Topics
['making False Statement on Oath' 'interaction Between Commonwealth and State Offences' 'abuse of Process']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

  1. 1 ['Whether the appellant knowingly made a false statement on oath contrary to s.330 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)' "Whether the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) 'covers the field' and precludes prosecution under the Crimes Act for the conduct" 'Whether prosecution should be stayed as an abuse of process']

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant knowingly made false statements on oath during examination and could properly be convicted under s330 of the Crimes Act, as the Corporations Act does not exclude concurrent State offences, and there was no basis for staying the prosecution as an abuse of process.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; conviction confirmed; sentence varied

Orders

  • ["Appellant's appeal dismissed" 'Conviction confirmed' "Magistrate's sentence set aside" 'Appellant sentenced to 12 months imprisonment, non-parole period of 6 months, parole period of 6 months' 'Sentence suspended for the whole period conditional upon good behaviour bond according to s12 of the Crimes (Sentencing...