Hyde, S.R. v Jones, D.A. [1987] FCA 610

Hyde, S.R. v Jones, D.A. [1987] FCA 610

The trial judge failed to make clear and necessary findings of fact regarding the defendant’s use of his left indicator and his position on the roadway prior to turning left. These findings were critical to determining liability and contributory negligence. The lack of clarity and specific findings led the appellate court to allow the appeal and remit the matter for further hearing.

Parties
Appellant: Stephen Robert Hyde; Respondent: Derrick Alan Jones
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 November 1987
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgment of Supreme Court of ACT set aside; proceedings remitted for further hearing.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Motor Vehicle Accidents, Personal Injury, Contributory Negligence
Tort Law Negligence Motor Vehicle Accidents Personal Injury Contributory Negligence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Robert Hyde

Appellant

Derrick Alan Jones

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was negligent in failing to indicate intention to turn left
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff was contributorily negligent in failing to keep a proper lookout and avoid the collision
  3. 3 Whether proper findings of fact were made regarding the defendant's use of the indicator and position on the roadway

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge failed to make clear and necessary findings of fact regarding the defendant’s use of his left indicator and his position on the roadway prior to turning left. These findings were critical to determining liability and contributory negligence. The lack of clarity and specific findings led the appellate court to allow the appeal and remit the matter for further hearing.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgment of Supreme Court of ACT set aside; proceedings remitted for further hearing.

Orders

  • The appeal be allowed, the judgment appealed from set aside and the proceedings remitted to the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory for further hearing.
  • The plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of the appeal and that the costs of the first trial abide the result of the further hearing.