Descon Group Australia Pty Ltd v Rodd (No 2) [2024] FCA 390
The original joint and several indemnity costs order against Descon and Irish Bentley Lawyers was improperly based on speculative reasoning. The Court varied the order so that only Descon is liable for indemnity costs, reflecting the proper exercise of discretion under s 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), and made no order as to costs of the application for leave to appeal and appeal, as no special circumstances under s 570(2) were submitted or established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Appeal Orders on Costs
- Outcome
- Original costs order varied; Descon to pay indemnity costs; no order for costs of leave to appeal and appeal; trust funds divided as specified.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'indemnity Costs' 'fair Work Act S 570' 'appeal Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Appeal Orders on Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Entitlement to costs following appeal under s 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)' 'Proper party to bear costs following variation of original order' 'Authority of Court to make or vary costs orders on appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
The original joint and several indemnity costs order against Descon and Irish Bentley Lawyers was improperly based on speculative reasoning. The Court varied the order so that only Descon is liable for indemnity costs, reflecting the proper exercise of discretion under s 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), and made no order as to costs of the application for leave to appeal and appeal, as no special circumstances under s 570(2) were submitted or established.
Court Disposition
Original costs order varied; Descon to pay indemnity costs; no order for costs of leave to appeal and appeal; trust funds divided as specified.
Orders
- ["The First Applicant shall pay the Respondent's costs of and incidental to matter no. MLG3698 of 2020 on an indemnity basis from the date the cross-claim was instituted." "The Respondent is authorised to pay from the funds held in trust by the Respondent's solicitors which were paid pursuant to the Order of this...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment