Templar v Britton (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 587

Templar v Britton (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 587

The history of delay and non-compliance in prosecuting the claim, while largely attributable to counsel, justifies dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims against the first and second defendants to avoid further prejudice to them, but not against the third defendant (State of New South Wales), for whom separate justice and limitation issues arise.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 May 2014
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Dismissal for Failure to Comply With Directions and Failure to Prosecute With Due Despatch
Outcome
Plaintiffs' claim against first and second defendants dismissed; parties to consult as to further directions to be made in proceedings against third defendant and as to costs.
Legal Topics
['dismissal for Want of Prosecution' 'breach of Court Directions' 'defamation Proceedings' 'case Management']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Application for Dismissal for Failure to Comply With Directions and Failure to Prosecute With Due Despatch

  1. 1 ['Whether the proceedings should be dismissed for breach of directions or failure to prosecute with due despatch' "Whether plaintiffs' non-compliance warrants dismissal of their claims against any or all defendants"]

Ratio Decidendi

The history of delay and non-compliance in prosecuting the claim, while largely attributable to counsel, justifies dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims against the first and second defendants to avoid further prejudice to them, but not against the third defendant (State of New South Wales), for whom separate justice and limitation issues arise.

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' claim against first and second defendants dismissed; parties to consult as to further directions to be made in proceedings against third defendant and as to costs.

Orders

  • ["Plaintiffs' claim against first and second defendants dismissed." 'Parties to consult as to further directions to be made in proceedings against third defendant.' 'Parties to consult as to costs.']