Travis v The Owners - Strata Plan No 48216 [2022] NSWCATCD 202

Travis v The Owners - Strata Plan No 48216 [2022] NSWCATCD 202

The proceedings were dismissed because the application did not seek an order under s 237(1), making an order under s 237(2) unavailable. Even if the application were construed as seeking s 237(1) relief, the Tribunal was not satisfied that urgent considerations justified the order, the balance of convenience did not support appointing a compulsory strata managing agent where the extraordinary general meeting was intended to appoint a functioning strata committee, the proposed appointment would make the meeting pointless by giving the strata managing agent full powers to control the owners corporation, and the relief sought was in substance final rather than interim for the particular...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 September 2022
Procedural Posture
Strata and Community Schemes Application Seeking Interim Orders Under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (nsw) / Hearing of Interim Application
Outcome
The proceedings are dismissed.
Legal Topics
['interim Orders' 'appointment of Strata Managing Agent' 'owners Corporation Management' 'extraordinary General Meeting' 'strata Committee']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Strata and Community Schemes Application Seeking Interim Orders Under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (nsw) / Hearing of Interim Application

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal should make an interim order in relation to the conduct of the extraordinary general meeting on 7 September 2022.' 'Whether the application properly sought an order under s 237(1) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW).' 'Whether urgent considerations justified the making of an interim order under s 231 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW).' 'Whether the balance of convenience supported appointing a compulsory strata managing agent for the meeting.']

Ratio Decidendi

The proceedings were dismissed because the application did not seek an order under s 237(1), making an order under s 237(2) unavailable. Even if the application were construed as seeking s 237(1) relief, the Tribunal was not satisfied that urgent considerations justified the order, the balance of convenience did not support appointing a compulsory strata managing agent where the extraordinary general meeting was intended to appoint a functioning strata committee, the proposed appointment would make the meeting pointless by giving the strata managing agent full powers to control the owners corporation, and the relief sought was in substance final rather than interim for the particular...

Court Disposition

The proceedings are dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The proceedings are dismissed.']