Bannigan v Ku ring gai Council [2022] NSWLEC 1434
The Court was satisfied that the legislative requirements for the making and modification of the development control orders were met and, by agreement of the parties, the appeal should be upheld and the orders modified accordingly under the relevant statutory powers.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Development Control Order / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development control orders modified by consent
- Legal Topics
- ['development Control Order' 'conciliation Conference' 'appeal' 'modification of Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Development Control Order / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the conditions for issuing the development control order existed under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Schedule 5, Part 1, Items 3 and 10' 'Whether the Court can modify the development control order by agreement under s.8.18(4) of the EPA Act']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that the legislative requirements for the making and modification of the development control orders were met and, by agreement of the parties, the appeal should be upheld and the orders modified accordingly under the relevant statutory powers.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development control orders modified by consent
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld' 'Pursuant to s.8.18(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the development control orders No. 3 & 10 dated 31 January 2022 given by the Respondent to the Applicant are modified in terms of the Modified Order attached as Annexure A']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment