Hann v Hann [2025] NSWSC 80

The subpoenas were set aside because they lacked a proper forensic purpose, were issued before the issues in dispute were sufficiently identified in the pleadings or affidavits, and access to bank statements was not justified by any live forensic dispute between the parties at the time.

Parties: Plaintiff: Steven Frederick Hann; Defendant: Paul Robert Hann
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 14 February 2025
Procedural Posture: Equity Applications List / Interlocutory Motion to Set Aside Subpoenas
Outcome: Subpoenas set aside; costs awarded to defendants, payable forthwith; destruction of accessed documents ordered.
Legal Topics: Subpoena, Abuse of Process, Interlocutory Applications

Civil Procedure Subpoena Abuse of Process Interlocutory Applications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2

Parties

Steven Frederick Hann

Plaintiff

Paul Robert Hann

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Equity Applications List / Interlocutory Motion to Set Aside Subpoenas

Legal Issues

1 Whether the subpoenas issued by the plaintiff to IMB Bank and Commonwealth Bank of Australia were an abuse of process for lack of proper forensic purpose

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Subpoenas set aside; costs awarded to defendants, payable forthwith; destruction of accessed documents ordered.

Orders

Set aside subpoenas issued 19 October 2023 to IMB Bank and Commonwealth Bank of Australia.
Plaintiff to pay defendants' costs of this motion, such costs to be assessed and payable forthwith.