Georgopolous v R [2010] NSWCCA 246
The applicant’s sentence was not excessive nor unjust, given the lack of demonstrated remorse and the circumstances of the offence. Any disparity between his and the co-offender’s sentence was justified by the co-offender’s remorse. The only error was the omission to order parole at the conclusion of the non-parole period, which was corrected by the appellate court.
- Parties
- Applicant: Steven Georgopolous; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence, Post Conviction
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed in part; sentence confirmed; order for parole made
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Appeals, Remorse as Mitigating Factor, Parity of Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven Georgopolous
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence, Post Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in assessing the objective seriousness of the offence
- 2 Whether there was unjust disparity between applicant's sentence and co-offender's sentence
- 3 Role and significance of remorse (and plea of guilty) under s 21A(3)(i) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant’s sentence was not excessive nor unjust, given the lack of demonstrated remorse and the circumstances of the offence. Any disparity between his and the co-offender’s sentence was justified by the co-offender’s remorse. The only error was the omission to order parole at the conclusion of the non-parole period, which was corrected by the appellate court.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed in part; sentence confirmed; order for parole made
Orders
- Leave to appeal is granted
- Appeal is allowed in part
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment