Brown, Steven John v The Queen [1983] FCA 375
There was no evidence independently implicating the appellant in the supply of a prohibited drug, and the trial judge's directions may have misled the jury to believe that such corroborative evidence existed. The conviction could not stand and was quashed; no new trial was ordered.
- Parties
- Appellant: Steven John Brown; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction in Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; no order for new trial.
- Legal Topics
- Corroboration, Accomplice Evidence, Judicial Directions, Drug Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven John Brown
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction in Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was sufficient corroboration of accomplice evidence for a conviction under s.5(c) of the Prohibited Drugs Act 1977-1981.
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in directing the jury as to what evidence could be considered corroborative.
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence independently implicating the appellant in the supply of a prohibited drug, and the trial judge's directions may have misled the jury to believe that such corroborative evidence existed. The conviction could not stand and was quashed; no new trial was ordered.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; no order for new trial.
Orders
- The appeal be allowed.
- The conviction of the appellant for supplying a prohibited drug contrary to s.5(c) of the Prohibited Drugs Act 1977-1981 entered on 13 May 1983 be quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment