Kelly v R [2017] NSWCCA 82
The sentencing judge erred by taking the applicant's prior criminal history into account in assessing the objective seriousness of the offences. However, after fresh consideration of the material, no lesser sentence was warranted in law and the appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Steven John Kelly; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Law Sentence Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Post Sentencing, Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Appeal, Aggravated Enter Dwelling With Intent, Armed Robbery, Assessment of Objective Seriousness, Application of Sentencing Guideline Judgment, Henry Guideline, Prior Criminal History
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven John Kelly
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law Sentence Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Post Sentencing, Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in taking into account prior criminal history in assessing objective seriousness of offences
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in the application of the Henry guideline judgment in assessing the indicative sentence for robbery
- 3 Whether a lesser sentence should be imposed
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by taking the applicant's prior criminal history into account in assessing the objective seriousness of the offences. However, after fresh consideration of the material, no lesser sentence was warranted in law and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted.
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment