Krotiris v R [2012] NSWCCA 28
It was within the sentencing judge's discretion to allow only a small discount (5%) as the Applicant's plea was entered at a very late stage and there was no evidence of earlier plea negotiations; the difference between the sentences for the Applicant and his co-offender was properly explained by the Applicant's more serious criminal record and his being on conditional liberty at the time, so no manifest disparity or error was established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Application for Leave and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'co Offenders' 'parity Principle' 'discount for Guilty Plea']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Application for Leave and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in allowing only a 5% discount for the utilitarian value of the plea of guilty' 'Whether there was a lack of parity between the sentence imposed on the Applicant and that imposed on his co-offender']
Ratio Decidendi
It was within the sentencing judge's discretion to allow only a small discount (5%) as the Applicant's plea was entered at a very late stage and there was no evidence of earlier plea negotiations; the difference between the sentences for the Applicant and his co-offender was properly explained by the Applicant's more serious criminal record and his being on conditional liberty at the time, so no manifest disparity or error was established.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment