R v Steven Paul HAINES [2009] NSWDC 418

R v Steven Paul HAINES [2009] NSWDC 418

The appropriate penalty for this offence, given its seriousness and the fact it was committed while on bail, is two years imprisonment, subject to suspension and the imposition of a good behaviour bond due to the plea of guilty at earliest opportunity and low objective seriousness of the conduct.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Defendant: Steven Paul Haines
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 November 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Outcome
Conviction; sentence of two years imprisonment suspended on condition of a two year good behaviour bond.
Legal Topics
Aggravated Break and Enter, Serious Indictable Offence, Sentencing, Suspended Sentence, Good Behaviour Bond, Rehabilitation, Drug Addiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Steven Paul Haines

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentence

  1. 1 What is the appropriate sentence for aggravated break and enter and commit serious indictable offence under s 112(2) Crimes Act 1900, considering plea of guilty, criminal history, offence circumstances, and rehabilitation potential?

Ratio Decidendi

The appropriate penalty for this offence, given its seriousness and the fact it was committed while on bail, is two years imprisonment, subject to suspension and the imposition of a good behaviour bond due to the plea of guilty at earliest opportunity and low objective seriousness of the conduct.

Court Disposition

Conviction; sentence of two years imprisonment suspended on condition of a two year good behaviour bond.

Orders

  • Conviction for aggravated break and enter and commit serious indictable offence.
  • Sentence of two years imprisonment imposed.