REGINA v BULLING [1999] NSWCCA 429
The material before the sentencing judge concerning the applicant's subjective circumstances, including his history and alcohol-related issues, was capable of establishing special circumstances. The failure to advert to special circumstances was sentencing error, requiring the Court to restructure the sentences.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Sentence restructured.
- Legal Topics
- ['demanding Money With Menaces' 'special Circumstances' 'minimum and Additional Terms' 'alcohol Addiction' 'offending While on Recognisance']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to consider whether special circumstances existed under section 5(2) of the Sentencing Act 1989.' "Whether the applicant's sentences should be restructured."]
Ratio Decidendi
The material before the sentencing judge concerning the applicant's subjective circumstances, including his history and alcohol-related issues, was capable of establishing special circumstances. The failure to advert to special circumstances was sentencing error, requiring the Court to restructure the sentences.
Court Disposition
Sentence restructured.
Orders
- ['The applicant is sentenced to a minimum term of two years penal servitude commencing 21 June 1998 and expiring 20 June 2000.' 'The applicant is sentenced to an additional term of two years commencing 21 June 2000 and expiring 21 June 2002.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment