Linforth v Manly Council [2012] NSWLEC 1352
Even though the proposal does not comply with several numerical controls in the DCP, it achieves the objectives of these controls. The impact on adjoining development, particularly the retention of views, is acceptable. Appropriate conditions relating to reduction in building height, side setbacks, and privacy screening are to be imposed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Steven & Stanislawa Linforth; Respondent: Manly Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Judgment Delivered After Hearing
- Outcome
- Development application approved subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Residential Flat Building, Design Controls, Amenity Impacts, View Loss, Landscaping
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven & Stanislawa Linforth
Applicant
Manly Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Judgment Delivered After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed development adversely impacts the amenity of adjoining residents, principally through view loss
- 2 Whether the non-compliance with planning controls is acceptable given the objectives are met
- 3 Whether view loss from adjoining properties is minimised
Ratio Decidendi
Even though the proposal does not comply with several numerical controls in the DCP, it achieves the objectives of these controls. The impact on adjoining development, particularly the retention of views, is acceptable. Appropriate conditions relating to reduction in building height, side setbacks, and privacy screening are to be imposed.
Court Disposition
Development application approved subject to conditions
Orders
- Applicant to file and serve plans by 21 January 2013 incorporating changes in draft conditions and plans, including a planter box along the western boundary to provide screen planting to a height of 2.5 m
- Parties to file agreed conditions reflecting the decision by 28 January 2013
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment