STIVACTAS v MICHALETOS [NO 1] [1993] NSWCA 256
The adjournment was granted on strict terms because the delay was not attributable to the appellant, who acted reasonably to secure suitable representation; no irreparable prejudice was shown, and an appropriate order for costs protected the respondent.
- Parties
- Appellant: Stivactas; Respondent: Michaletos
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory (application for Adjournment in Court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- Adjournment granted (majority: Kirby P, Clarke JA; Cripps JA dissenting)
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment, Appeal, Expedition of Appeal Hearing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stivactas
Appellant
Michaletos
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory (application for Adjournment in Court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the hearing of the appeal should be adjourned due to the appellant's need for a Greek-speaking barrister and consequent lack of representation
- 2 Whether the appellant is personally responsible for delay in prosecuting the appeal
- 3 Whether prejudice to the respondent, including age and mental condition, justifies refusal of the adjournment
Ratio Decidendi
The adjournment was granted on strict terms because the delay was not attributable to the appellant, who acted reasonably to secure suitable representation; no irreparable prejudice was shown, and an appropriate order for costs protected the respondent.
Court Disposition
Adjournment granted (majority: Kirby P, Clarke JA; Cripps JA dissenting)
Orders
- The hearing of the appeal is adjourned.
- The appeal hearing is to be expedited and listed for Tuesday 27 July 1993 (category B).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment