STM 123 No.2 Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2016] NSWLEC 1550
As the parties reached an agreement at or after a conciliation conference, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreement was within the Court's powers, the Court was required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal of Development Application Decision / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld under agreed terms pursuant to s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'court Approved Settlement' 'conciliation Conference' 'appeal Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal of Development Application Decision / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 between the parties could be adopted as the Court's decision"]
Ratio Decidendi
As the parties reached an agreement at or after a conciliation conference, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreement was within the Court's powers, the Court was required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld under agreed terms pursuant to s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Orders
- ["The application Class 1 as filed by the Applicant in these proceedings is amended in accordance with the document annexed and marked 'A'." 'The appeal is upheld.' "Application No. of DA-205/2015 for the demolition of an existing 4 storey residential flat building and the construction of a 3-4 storey residential...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment