STOJANOVSKI v GHEITI [1996] NSWCA 505

STOJANOVSKI v GHEITI [1996] NSWCA 505

The trial judge did not commit appealable error in resolving the credibility and factual disputes; the in-court observations did not significantly influence the decision, and did not constitute denial of natural justice or procedural fairness.

Parties
Appellant: Stojanovski; Respondent: Gheiti
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 May 1996
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Credibility Assessment, Natural Justice, Procedural Fairness, In Court Observations, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Appellate Review of Factual Findings
Damages Personal Injury Credibility Assessment Natural Justice Procedural Fairness In Court Observations Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Appellate Review of Factual Findings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stojanovski

Appellant

Gheiti

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge committed appealable error in resolving contradictory findings of fact and assessing the plaintiff's credibility
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge's in-court observations denied procedural fairness or natural justice

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge did not commit appealable error in resolving the credibility and factual disputes; the in-court observations did not significantly influence the decision, and did not constitute denial of natural justice or procedural fairness.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.