In the Matter of Cazihaven Homes Pty Ltd Stoland Pty Ltd v Thurn, Peter James & Anor [1996] FCA 784
The court should exercise its discretion in favour of granting an adjournment where failure to do so would occasion significant prejudice to the applicant and not due to any fault of the applicant or its representatives, despite prejudice to the respondent which may be addressed in part by costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: Stoland Pty Limited; First Respondent: Peter James Thurn; Second Respondent: William Gary Quick
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 1996
- Procedural Posture
- General Division / Interlocutory (application for Adjournment)
- Outcome
- Adjournment granted; costs of today reserved.
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stoland Pty Limited
Applicant
Peter James Thurn
First Respondent
William Gary Quick
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
General Division / Interlocutory (application for Adjournment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant an adjournment to allow the applicant to obtain documents for use as foundation for expert accounting evidence on solvency
Ratio Decidendi
The court should exercise its discretion in favour of granting an adjournment where failure to do so would occasion significant prejudice to the applicant and not due to any fault of the applicant or its representatives, despite prejudice to the respondent which may be addressed in part by costs.
Court Disposition
Adjournment granted; costs of today reserved.
Orders
- Matter listed on Monday, 28 October at 10.15 am.
- Costs of today are reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment