Stora Australia Pty Ltd v Anti-Dumping Authority & Ors [1998] FCA 594

Stora Australia Pty Ltd v Anti-Dumping Authority & Ors [1998] FCA 594

Section 9(2) of the Anti-Dumping Authority Act 1988 (Cth), read with ss 5(d) and 6, was broad enough to authorise the Authority to inquire into an anti-dumping matter and report to the Minister, including by recommending publication of a notice under s 269TG(1) of the Customs Act 1901 (Cth). Section 7 regulated a particular mandatory inquiry following specified application-based procedures and did not impliedly limit the Authority's separate s 9 power, especially because the Minister may impose dumping duties in the public interest without an application under s 269TB. The Anthony Hordern principle was not engaged so as to invalidate the special inquiry.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 June 1998
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 39 B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (cth) for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief / Final Hearing of Application
Outcome
Application dismissed.
Legal Topics
['anti Dumping Authority Powers' 'statutory Construction' 'dumping Duty Notices' 'special Inquiry Under S 9(2) of the Anti Dumping Authority Act 1988 (cth)' 'negative Prima Facie Decision or Negative Preliminary Finding']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Under S 39 B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (cth) for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief / Final Hearing of Application

  1. 1 ['Whether the Anti-Dumping Authority could conduct an inquiry under s 9(2) of the Anti-Dumping Authority Act 1988 (Cth) where other provisions expressly authorised and governed inquiries.' 'Whether the Authority could recommend publication of a notice under s 269TG(1) of the Customs Act 1901 (Cth) when acting under s 9(2).' 'Whether s 9(2) permitted the Authority, after confirming a negative preliminary finding, to initiate a special inquiry concerning the same subject matter.']

Ratio Decidendi

Section 9(2) of the Anti-Dumping Authority Act 1988 (Cth), read with ss 5(d) and 6, was broad enough to authorise the Authority to inquire into an anti-dumping matter and report to the Minister, including by recommending publication of a notice under s 269TG(1) of the Customs Act 1901 (Cth). Section 7 regulated a particular mandatory inquiry following specified application-based procedures and did not impliedly limit the Authority's separate s 9 power, especially because the Minister may impose dumping duties in the public interest without an application under s 269TB. The Anthony Hordern principle was not engaged so as to invalidate the special inquiry.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.']