Strata Plan 37107 v Symonds [2011] NSWLEC 1331
The evidence did not establish a sufficient causal nexus between the respondents' trees and alleged damage to the applicant's property or sewer, except possibly minimal contribution by the Camphor Laurel to an already deteriorated wall. Removal or intervention orders were found disproportionate and unreasonable; thus, the application was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Strata Plan 37107; Respondents: S & R Symonds
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Damage to Property by Trees, Tree Removal, Neighbour Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Strata Plan 37107
Applicant
S & R Symonds
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trees on the respondents' property have caused, are causing, or are likely in the near future to cause, damage to the applicant's property or sewer pipes
- 2 Whether removal of trees or repair contributions are warranted under the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not establish a sufficient causal nexus between the respondents' trees and alleged damage to the applicant's property or sewer, except possibly minimal contribution by the Camphor Laurel to an already deteriorated wall. Removal or intervention orders were found disproportionate and unreasonable; thus, the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment